| |
By Jean Marie Gath
Building a performing arts facility is
possibly one of the most challenging projects any public agency, arts
organization or academic institution will undertake. Not only is it one of
the most expensive types of facilities to build, but also its operational
costs greatly exceed those of most other public or educational facilities.
As a facility manager, it’s likely that you may be asked to be involved or
even lead an effort to consider a new venue. Where do you begin? What issues
should you consider? What questions should be asked? How do you know you’re
building the “right” facility, and what will guarantee its success?
In the course of directing the cultural planning efforts at Pfeiffer
Partners, a firm that has programmed and designed more than 50 centers for
the arts across the country, I’ve found that the two most important
questions that need to be asked in the early planning phases of a performing
arts facility are: “What is the appropriate seat count?” and “Do we need a
fly tower?”
The answers to these two questions are interrelated and will influence both
the construction and operational costs of the facility, as well as the types
of necessary support spaces that will be required.
Appropriate Seat Count
The answer to determining the appropriate seat count is derived by
considering the following.
Who is the audience? As you know,
there’s no audience for a building, per se. Instead, audiences are drawn by
the performance, whether it is music, opera, theater, dance or a Broadway
show. The crucial question is, who is your audience — and what events and
performances will attract them?
Where do they go now to participate in the arts? How will your facility
differentiate itself from other nearby facilities? How large is the region
from which you are able to draw your audience? What is the demographic
make-up of the audience–education, income, age?
National
studies indicate that educational attainment, even more than income level,
is the greatest indicator of the propensity to attend cultural events. Do
your homework. Know who your audience is today, and predict who it might be
in the next five to 10 years.
Touring Broadway shows. If your goal is
to attract touring Broadway shows, a rule of thumb is that the minimum seat
count for these events is 2,000, with many facilities ranging in size from
2,500 to 3,000 seats. For comparison, most regional symphonies will draw
between 1,200 to 1,600 patrons per event. Obviously, there are exceptions to
the rule.
Regional and academic arts organizations.
In determining the appropriate seat count, it’s important to remember that
it’s difficult for most regional theater groups, music ensembles or academic
performers to attract audiences of the magnitude of a touring Broadway show.
In fact, not only do they often feel lost in such a space, they’re not able
to afford to rent a room of this size and technical complexity. Playing to a
halffilled room is disconcerting to even the most seasoned performer.
Similarly, audiences feel uncomfortable in a venue that feels empty. The
question is whether you’re building a performing arts facility for touring
Broadway shows or hoping to fulfill the needs of local and regional arts
organizations and/or academic department.
Many agencies and institutions resolve this question by providing multiple
performance venues when finances allow. Others look for creative
architectural solutions that enable a room to reduce its seat count through
moveable seats, flexible room configurations and a combination of lighting
and screening techniques. The success of such rooms varies widely.
To Fly or Not to Fly
The second question — whether or not to build a fly tower — is equally
complicated and is determined in part by balancing theatrical demands with
available financial resources. (At 90 to 100 feet tall and 50 x 100 feet in
dimension, these are not inexpensive components to build). Topics to
consider revolve around the following.
Who are the performers? What types of
performers will use the facility, and how often? Just as shopping centers
don’t build for the peak holidays, it’s important not to overbuild an arts
facility — creating a performance venue that will only be used on occasion
and otherwise sits dark. Since these are expensive buildings to build and
operate, it’s important that they’re actively programmed and as busy as
possible — weekdays as well as weekends. Another rule of thumb is that a
performance venue should be booked a minimum of 250 days annually (including
both rehearsals and performances).
Ask the users. Ask yourself (and the
potential users) the question: “Do the organizations that wish to use the
performance space require a fly tower — and if so, to what level of
complexity?”
 |
|
A performance venue’s seating capacity should
be planned according to its general needs, not those of the peak
season. Additionally, the venue should be booked a minimum of 250
days annually, including rehearsals and performances. |
While touring Broadway shows, as well as
some regional theatrical organizations, require a fully developed fly
tower (for flying sets, etc.), many other types of performances do not.
These include music, dance, some forms of theater, comedy, lectures,
etc. Performance spaces can still be multi-use without necessarily
requiring a fly tower.
A rule of thumb is that the addition of a fly tower (and its necessary
equipment and support area) can add as much as $5 million to the price
of construction.
Pick Any Two
There are three variables relative to determining the costs of an arts
facility:
• Quantity. The amount of square
footage you wish to build
• Quality. The level of construction
quality (including acoustical) that you desire
• Budget. The available financial
resources
If your budget is fixed, you must be able to balance the amount of
square footage you desire with the level of quality envisioned. If your
square footage is fixed, as is your level of quality, then the
multiplication of these two factors will tell you how much your budget
needs to be. Remember, don’t just consider construction costs; such a
facility must also be equipped and furnished.
A final rule of thumb is that approximately 65% of your costs will go
toward hard costs — construction. The remaining 35% will fund soft costs
— fixtures, furniture, equipment, fees, contingencies, etc. Establish
your budget early on, and monitor it often.
Importance of Programming
Studies have shown that 90% of user dissatisfaction with an arts
facility is a result of decisions made during the initial programming
phase, giving rise to the adage: “If you don’t have the right program,
you’ll never have the right building.”
Spend the time necessary to develop a well thought-through space
program. Time spent up front resolving the above issues will save time
and money later on in the process. It’s time and money well spent.
Jean Marie
Gath is a principal — planning, with Pfeiffer Partners Architects, New York
City, and Los Angeles. |
|