Back to Facility Manager Contents

Back to Home

 
 

 
 

By Lawrence Henley

When you take a job at a university, being on committees and doing work related to them comes with the territory, generally speaking. No sooner are you settled in than you learn that your predecessor had a seat on a certain committee — and you’re expected to do the same.

Then you get a phone call, letter or email inviting you to join another committee. Next, you miss one meeting and find out they’ve elected you chairman while you were gone. Then you’re asked to participate on an employment search committee, and an honors society also snaps you up. Before you know it, you and your calendar are up to your figurative necks in committee meetings.

For whatever reason (the usual one cited is that it’s the Socratic way of getting things done), universities don’t function under a top-down decision-making process — which isn’t to say that most schools don’t have strong presidents, provosts and deans, because most do. However, literally thousands of employees and students present and future will feel the effects of the myriad decisions that must be made, and it’s believed that the involvement of the many (the “intelligencia,” if you will) supercedes the insights of the one. Things work this way at public and private schools, so there’s no escape anywhere in academia.

It Keeps You Running
I’ve been on as many as seven different committees and/or searches simultaneously. I’ve served on everything from the campus facility use committee to the parking and traffic committee to the committee on cart usage. It seems like no sooner does one committee finish their work, you find yourself appointed to another one. Naturally, the better job you do, the more the committee structure wants you for its next appointment. One standing committee I’m on (commencement) brands its operatives as “lifetime members.” That’s right, you can only get yourself out of the loop by leaving the institution, doing a really lousy job or dying.

How many thousands of hours have I spent in committee meetings? Let’s see — at peak it’s roughly four to eight hours per week, times 17 weeks in a semester times two, plus occasional summer meetings, times 18 years. The sum comes frighteningly close to two entire years of my career devoted to these meetings. Fortunately, some are fun; unfortunately, some are downright brain numbing.

The negative side of the question we know all too well: long weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, quarterly and even semi-annual meetings. There we are, a dozen or more of us slouching over a conference table, plodding through an agenda, sometimes rehashing the same dead horse issue in three to four consecutive meetings. How do you get the guy from the philosophy or physics department to agree with you on everything? And, of course, committees lead to homework assignments and even subcommittees, which lead to even more meetings. The meetings begin to self-multiply exponentially.

Further problems occur in those weeks during mid-late semester when your facility is working overtime to begin with and then you have those three committee meetings taking you away from things you need to deal with in your own backyard.

What’s the Alternative?
Of course, many high-profile agencies such as the U.S. Congress and state governments work in much the same manner, as do associations such as IAAM and Arts Presenters. I can’t exactly blame the history of the committee game on the universities alone. However, the amount of focus given committees when it comes to working out business for college campuses seems hideously excessive at times.

Couldn’t a single, central authority get down and dirty to get the job done expeditiously and with improved efficiency? What happened to top-down, followthe- leader means of accomplishment? These are things I often ask myself.

But enough on the negative; let’s examine the positive side of committee systems. Committee decision-making tends to ensure that all points of view will be taken into consideration. The inclusiveness of the committee means of progression tends to be part of a consensus-building approach. Decisions made by consensus usually take a lot longer to arrive upon — but they tend to be those that do the most good and last the longest.

Get in the Game
So, you ask (after the complaining, negative picture I’ve painted for you), what personal gains and benefits are in the committee game for you?

Committee involvement gets you into the mix with other departments and agencies at the university. Not only that, it looks great listed on your annual merit application (committee participation is often considered an overload). You’re seen as a team player with more than just your own operation on your agenda. Many times the connections you make or strengthen through committee involvement help you tap into resources or provide problem-solving help for your facility that you wouldn’t have access to otherwise.

You can also learn through committee networking of news that will affect your department in the near future. I’ve found that colleagues I’ve met while serving on committees will hear of a new development regarding changes on campus that could affect me, relay the item to me, and then call or send me an e-mail to give me the heads-up.

When the game works, it really works. It does feel good to know that you’ve been part of the solution, rather than the opposite. Another thing that feels good is the recognition you receive when authority notes your participation. Occasionally, you’re even thanked — sometimes in writing!

What’s the best part about the committee game? You’ll meet some of the best people on campus (and some terrific friends) through the course of committee work. Committees do add lots of work to your plate while devouring valuable hours from your precious calendar, but they’re part and parcel to the collaborative role we play in the life of our university.

The bottom line is that committee service helps you to become more than just another employee — it allows you to become interwoven into the fabric of your institution.

Lawrence Henley is director of artistic programming and production at the Performing Arts Center at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas.

 
  © 2002-2007 International Association of Assembly Managers 635 Fritz Dr.
Coppell, TX 75019 USA   Phone: 972/906-7441 Fax: 972/906-7418